It was always pretty clearly illegal under US law and I’m surprised it took this long but Linden Labs has finally banned gambling in Second Life.
Reading the user comments is instructive and two things pop out at me from them.
- Many users demonstrate a certain hostility to the puritanical culture of the US, blaming it for banning what is legal in many places in the world (as a US citizen who has zero problem with gambling I might point out to them that banning free expression and outlawing things like a swastika because it’s illegal in, say, Germany, is far more offensive to me a ban on gambling. The right to be a fool and throw away your money rates a lot lower than the right to express yourself on my personal scale of important freedoms.) Comments include, “The USA’s Christian Taliban wins again!” and, “Move your servers to Europe. This is absolutely ridiculous.“
- Many users are unable or unwilling to distinguish between activities they are actually engaging in, such as gambling, and activities they are just pretending to be engaging in, such as prostitution. Comments include, “What’s the difference between escorts and gambling? It’s real money being used, you’re very naive if you think escorts aren’t next,” (Uh, yeah, who is being naive here?) and, “I wonder if the next hit will be on us escorts, put that prostitution is, too, illegal in the USA.”
There were some supportive comments as well, generally pointing out that Linden has no practical choice in the matter. Moving to the Isle of Man or whatnot is hardly worth it when a ban on gambling isn’t a game-ender for Second Life.
4 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 9th, 2007 at 12:12 pm
Pingback from Virtually Blind - Virtual Law | Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds » Blog Archive » The Legality of the (Virtual) World’s Oldest Profession
July 27th, 2007 at 5:44 am
Andrew Crystall
Taking property off someone European for gambling and not paying them back any cash they’d invested in it when it’s perfectly legal here… is very likely, under at least British and Spanish law, various forms of theft. Just to add to the legal pot.
What struck me was not “in 30 days”, it was “as of now”. That’s a highly unfriendly approach - LL knew the deadline was coming…
August 1st, 2007 at 8:32 am
Stavros
It is most funny I think, that people criticize the US puritans or whatever. It is even funnier to try to bring national laws and believes into other countries and do this with the mindset, that the own value system is objectively an inherently superior or better, like the “swastika and freedom of speech” example.
As this is too funny, I would rather like to comment on LL and gambling from another perspective: rules of free market.
If gambling and prostitution, which in the given argumentation, is likely to be “next”, are essential to SL success, then SL and all of us should see the results in the next months in fewer residents or less L-$ turnover. If it is not essential, it will be forgotten soon.
The other aspect, which I think could end before the court is “Taking property without paying them back any cash”. This was done in the current law suit with Braggs, and it does seem that the PE judge, as far as I understood US law, does not accept the TOS of LL. Either LL hopes, that because of the raunchiness of gambling, courts will support them in the first place, or they did not mention any connection between the cases, or they hope that EU residents will not come over to sue them.
The point I want to make is, that SL is no game, but about business. I start to see LL as some sort of ISP, or better VSP (Virtual world Service Provider). ISPs would shut down, or curb the website if legislation changes, but in no case would they just sack everything (web space, quotas, SLA, etc.) without reimbursements.
I personally hope, that LL did just forbid them to carry on gambling instead of taking away things.
August 2nd, 2007 at 3:38 am
SamySosa
there was never a pinch of gambling presence on second life, all this noise is another spin of the PR well oiled machine of SL.
I saw today an article of who easy it is to become the owner of an online casino and SL banned it because they know they have more to lose then to win.
If you want thats the link:
www.wwwpd.org